Proximate Futures

Stage 10 · Synthesis

Network Intelligence

Eleven findings from a snowball referral network of 900+ actors across the Nigerian food system — from structural bridges to trust signals, fundability gaps, and distributed hubs of influence.

01

The Snowball Accelerated

From 7 people to 897 edges — the network didn't just expand, it deepened.

7

Seed Advisors

103

Round 1 Network

521

Round 2 Expansion

897

Total Edges

The network didn't just grow — it deepened, with edge density increasing faster than node count

02

Independent Trust Signals

Convergence across unconnected sources is the strongest trust signal in the dataset.

58%

Round 1 Referrals

521 nominations

28%

Round 2 Cross-Nominations

248 nominations

14%

Independent Snowball

128 nominations

14% of nominations came from actors with no shared referral pathway — independent convergence is the strongest trust signal in the dataset.

03

The True Network Brokers

96 of 103 Round 1 actors became referrers — embedded enough to generate their own networks outward.

Referral Rate

93% of Round 1 became referrers

96 of 103 Round 1 actors referred at least one new advisor

Top Referrers

1

A. Okonkwo

Consulting Firm

18
2

F. Ibrahim

Academic / Research

16
3

C. Adeyemi

Network Partner

14
4

M. Bello

Government Agency

13

04

Organizational Type Distribution

The 900+ actors span ten distinct role categories — most are not directly fundable.

539+

Total Actors Across 10 Categories

Network Partner
7
Ecosystem Advisor
96
Snowball Referral
213
Government
58
Academic / Research
47
Private Sector
39
Civil Society
34
Funder / Philanthropy
22
Media / Comms
14
Community Leader
9

Most actors are not directly fundable — only 1.3% are Network Partners. The ecosystem is broad, but the fundable surface is narrow.

05

Ecosystem Role Distribution

Round 1 ecosystem advisors categorized by their recommender-stated role in the food system.

957

ecosystem advisors across 13 role categories

Agriculture Extension Service Provider
24826%
Infrastructure Provider (e.g., storage, transport, irrigation)
16217%
Insurance Provider
11612%
Connector / Convener
9810%
Capacity Builder / Trainer
818%
Standards or Certification Body
728%
Input Supplier
546%
Financier / Donor
364%
Advisor
303%
Advocate
243%
Storyteller
182%
Off-taker / Buyer
111%
Researcher
71%

Live from Airtable. Distribution of recommender-stated ecosystem roles among Round 1 ecosystem advisors — revealing the structural composition of the network beyond fundable organizations.

06

Geographic Spread

The network spans all six Nigerian geopolitical zones — a nationwide footprint.

6

Nigerian geopolitical zones — 892 actors mapped

South West
21424%
North Central
17820%
South East
14316%
North West
12514%
South South
11613%
North East
11613%

Nationwide footprint. The network spans all six geopolitical zones of Nigeria, with the heaviest concentration in the South West and North Central — reflecting the density of food systems organizations around Lagos, Abuja, and surrounding agricultural corridors.

07

Structural Bridges

Six actors bridging independent sub-networks — the highest-leverage funding targets.

Six actors sit at the intersection of otherwise disconnected sub-networks — the highest-leverage funding targets for system-wide impact.

1

H. Mohammed

Northern Research Network↔Southern Extension Cluster
12 edges
2

R. Eze

Policy Advisory Group↔Community Development Network
11 edges
3

K. Yusuf

Pastoralist Governance↔Climate Adaptation Cluster
10 edges
4

S. Okafor

Market Systems Group↔Smallholder Finance Network
9 edges
5

D. Aliyu

Conflict Resolution Network↔Agricultural Innovation Hub
8 edges
6

B. Nwosu

Nutrition Advocacy↔Production Systems Cluster
8 edges

08

Genuine Diversity

Low overlap across System Advisor networks signals distinct sub-networks, not an echo chamber.

11%

Avg. Network Overlap

89%

Unique Nominations

Pairwise Overlap (Sample)

Advisor A ↔ Advisor B
8%
Advisor A ↔ Advisor C
4%
Advisor B ↔ Advisor C
6%
Advisor C ↔ Advisor D
3%
Advisor D ↔ Advisor E
5%

Low overlap signals distinct sub-networks — not an echo chamber. Each advisor reaches people the others don't.

09

Admired From Afar

A quarter of the ecosystem was nominated by people who have never met them.

25%

Nominated Without Prior Contact

A quarter of the ecosystem was nominated by people who have never met them — reputation travels independently of personal ties.

130

Reputation-Based

391

Personal Contact

This validates the network's credibility — actors are recognized for their work, not just their proximity to the nominator.

10

Partner Downstream Reach

Network Partners with cross-sector, Nigeria-embedded networks generate more expansive referral chains.

Partner Alpha

5 sectorsNigeria-Embedded

42

referral chain length

Partner Beta

4 sectorsNigeria-Embedded

38

referral chain length

Partner Gamma

6 sectorsNigeria-Embedded

28

referral chain length

Partner Delta

3 sectors

19

referral chain length

Partner Epsilon

2 sectors

15

referral chain length

Partners with cross-sector, Nigeria-embedded networks generate the longest referral chains — depth of local trust drives expansive reach.

11

A Flat, Multi-Hub Structure

Multiple active brokers generating similar volumes — no single bottleneck.

No single bottleneck — six active hubs each generate 65-94 edges. The network is structurally flat, not hierarchical.

Hub A — Northern Research94
Hub B — Extension Services88
Hub C — Policy & Finance82
Hub D — Community Development76
Hub E — Market Systems71
Hub F — Innovation & Tech65

A flat structure means resilience — removing any single hub doesn't collapse the network.